Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: R5 - Regional structure
Message number: 546
Message text: Different residence city is the same as city, so deleted
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
R5546
- Different residence city is the same as city, so deleted ?The SAP error message R5546, which states "Different residence city is the same as city, so deleted," typically occurs in the context of maintaining address data for a business partner or employee in the SAP system. This error indicates that there is a conflict between the residence city and the city fields in the address data.
Cause:
The error arises when the system detects that the residence city (the city where the person resides) is the same as the city (the city associated with the address) but is being treated as a different entry. This can happen due to:
- Data Entry Error: The user may have entered the same city in both fields, leading to redundancy.
- Configuration Issues: There may be issues with how the address data is configured in the system, leading to inconsistencies.
- Data Migration Issues: If data was migrated from another system, it may not have been formatted correctly, causing conflicts.
Solution:
To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
Check Address Data: Review the address data for the business partner or employee in question. Ensure that the residence city and city fields are correctly populated and that they are not redundantly set to the same value unless intended.
Correct Data Entry: If the residence city and city are indeed the same, you may need to adjust the data entry to ensure that the system recognizes them as intended. You can either:
- Remove the residence city if it is not necessary.
- Ensure that both fields are filled correctly if they are meant to be different.
Review Configuration: If the issue persists, check the configuration settings related to address management in SAP. Ensure that the settings allow for the correct handling of residence and city fields.
Data Migration Review: If the data was migrated, review the migration process to ensure that it correctly handled the address fields. You may need to clean up the data in the source system or during the migration process.
Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for specific guidance on address management and error handling.
Contact Support: If you are unable to resolve the issue, consider reaching out to your SAP support team or consulting with SAP support for further assistance.
Related Information:
BP
(Business Partner) or PA30
(Maintain HR Master Data).By following these steps, you should be able to identify the cause of the error and implement a solution to resolve it.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
R5545
City &1 has no different postal city, so city &2 deleted
What causes this issue? City <(>&<)>V1<(>&<)> was entered in the field 'Diff. res. city', and the field ...
R5544
City &1 has no different postal city, so moved to field 'City'
What causes this issue? The city <(>&<)>V1<(>&<)> was entered in the field 'Diff. res. city', and the field...
R5547
City &1 has postal city &2, so &1 put in 'Diff. res. city'
What causes this issue? The city <(>&<)>V1<(>&<)> is not postally autonomous. Its postal city <(>&<)>...
R5548
Diff. res. city &1 is for city &3, not city &2, adjusted
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.