How To Fix MQ561 - No differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: MQ - Messages for Euro Changeover Package

• Message number: 561

• Message text: No differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message MQ561 - No differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date ?

  The SAP error message MQ561, which states "No differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date," typically occurs during the reconciliation process between fixed assets and general ledger (G/L) accounts. This message indicates that there are no discrepancies found between the asset balances and the corresponding G/L accounts as of the specified key date. 
  Cause:
  
  No Transactions: There may not have been any transactions affecting the fixed assets or G/L accounts since the last reconciliation.
  Correct Configuration: The system is correctly configured, and the balances are indeed matching, which is a positive outcome.
  Timing Issues: The key date selected for the reconciliation may not align with the periods in which transactions were recorded.
  Data Entry Errors: If there were any data entry errors or missing postings in either the asset accounting or G/L accounts, it could lead to this message, but in this case, it would typically indicate that the system found no discrepancies.
  Reconciliation Process: The reconciliation process may have been executed correctly, leading to no differences being reported.
  
  Solution:
  
  Verify Transactions: Check the asset accounting and G/L accounts for any recent transactions to ensure that they have been posted correctly.
  Review Key Date: Ensure that the key date used for the reconciliation is appropriate and reflects the period you want to analyze.
  Run Reconciliation Reports: Use the appropriate SAP reports (e.g., S_ALR_87011963 for asset balances) to verify that the balances are indeed matching.
  Check Configuration: Ensure that the configuration settings for asset accounting and G/L accounts are correct and that the integration between the two is functioning as expected.
  Consult Documentation: Review SAP documentation or help resources for any specific notes related to this error message.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: Familiarize yourself with relevant transaction codes such as AS03 (Display Asset), FBL3N (G/L Account Line Items), and S_ALR_87011963 (Asset Balances).
  SAP Notes: Check SAP Notes for any updates or patches that may address specific issues related to asset accounting and G/L reconciliation.
  Training and Support: If you are unsure about the reconciliation process, consider seeking training or support from your SAP team or consulting with SAP support.
  
  In summary, the MQ561 message indicates that there are no discrepancies between the asset and G/L accounts, which can be a normal and expected outcome. However, if you are expecting differences, further investigation into transactions and configurations may be necessary.