Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: HRPSGB_ABS -
Message number: 103
Message text: Val. Rule &1 ( &2 / &3 ) is not allowed a Counting Class or a Wage Type
Absence "Valuation Rules for Part Days" derive their Counting Classes
and Wage Types from their COMPLETE day counter part.
A "Valuation Rule for Part Days" is NOT allowed a Counting Class or a
Wage Type, as PAB would process them incorrectly using the data from
PSP and AB rather than the Entitlement Minutes stored on the structure
COVER.
Customising of this Valuation Rule is incorrect in T554C. Having a
Personnel Calculation Rule of "GORD" attached to a Valuation Rule
implies that the Valuation Rule is ONLY for Part Days.
Remove ALL Counting Classes and Wage Types from this Valuation Rule or
alternatively remove "GORD" from the PCR field.
(<zh>G</>reat Britain <zh>O</>SP/OMP <zh>R</>ead <zh>D</>ata)
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
HRPSGB_ABS103
- Val. Rule &1 ( &2 / &3 ) is not allowed a Counting Class or a Wage Type ?The SAP error message HRPSGB_ABS103 indicates that there is an issue with the configuration of a valuation rule in the context of absence management. Specifically, it suggests that the valuation rule you are trying to use is not compatible with the counting class or wage type specified.
Cause:
- Incompatible Valuation Rule: The valuation rule defined in the system is not allowed to be used with the specified counting class or wage type. This could be due to incorrect configuration or a mismatch in the settings.
- Configuration Issues: The absence type or the wage type may not be properly configured in the system, leading to this error when trying to process absences.
- Missing Entries: There may be missing entries in the configuration tables that link valuation rules to counting classes or wage types.
Solution:
Check Configuration:
- Go to the configuration settings for absence types and valuation rules in the SAP system.
- Ensure that the valuation rule you are trying to use is correctly assigned to the counting class and wage type in question.
Review Counting Classes and Wage Types:
- Verify that the counting class and wage type are correctly defined and that they are compatible with the valuation rule.
- You can check the configuration in transaction codes like SPRO (SAP Reference IMG) and navigate to the relevant sections for Absence Management.
Adjust Valuation Rules:
- If necessary, modify the valuation rules to ensure they are compatible with the counting classes and wage types you are using.
- You may need to create new valuation rules or adjust existing ones based on your organization's requirements.
Testing:
- After making changes, perform tests to ensure that the error no longer occurs and that absences are processed correctly.
Consult Documentation:
- Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for detailed information on configuring absence management and valuation rules.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the HRPSGB_ABS103 error and ensure that your absence management processes function smoothly.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
HRPSGB_ABS102
Payment Band Changed from '&1' to '&2' on &3 for '&4' absence
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
HRPSGB_ABS101
Limit Rule &2 not in customising (T5GPBS30) ( &1 / &3 )
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
HRPSGB_ABS104
The employee's PS Grouping changes from &1 to &2 on &3.
What causes this issue? There is a split in this employee's Infotype 0001. This has resulted in their Absence Modifier (MOABW) changing during t...
HRPSGB_ABS105
Seniority/Age "As At Date" is missing. Feature GLOSS or GAGES incorrect
What causes this issue? This employee belongs to an employee grouping that has been customised to derive its Age and/or Seniority as at a specific ca...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.