How To Fix HRPBSSG606 - Begin day of Interdiction 2 is ealier than the end day of interdiction 1

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPBSSG - Message Class For Public Sector(Singapore)

• Message number: 606

• Message text: Begin day of Interdiction 2 is ealier than the end day of interdiction 1

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message HRPBSSG606 - Begin day of Interdiction 2 is ealier than the end day of interdiction 1 ?

  The SAP error message HRPBSSG606 indicates that there is a conflict in the dates set for two interdictions (or restrictions) in the system. Specifically, it means that the start date of the second interdiction overlaps with the end date of the first interdiction, which is not allowed.
  Cause:
  This error typically arises in the context of employee management, particularly when dealing with employee absences, restrictions, or other types of leave. The system requires that the periods of interdiction (or absence) do not overlap in a way that would create ambiguity about the employee's status.
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you need to check the dates of the interdictions in question. Here are the steps you can take:
  
  
  Review Interdiction Records: Go to the relevant infotype (e.g., Infotype 2001 for Absences) and check the records for the employee in question. Look specifically at the start and end dates of the interdictions.
  
  
  Adjust Dates: If the start date of Interdiction 2 is indeed earlier than the end date of Interdiction 1, you will need to adjust one of the dates:
  
  Change the start date of Interdiction 2 to be after the end date of Interdiction 1.
  Alternatively, if Interdiction 1 is no longer valid, you may consider adjusting or deleting it.
  
  
  
  Check for Overlaps: Ensure that there are no other records that might be causing overlaps. This includes checking for any other types of leave or absence that might conflict with the interdictions.
  
  
  Save Changes: After making the necessary adjustments, save the changes and try to process the record again.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Infotypes: Familiarize yourself with the relevant infotypes in SAP HR that deal with absences and interdictions, such as Infotype 2001 (Absences) and Infotype 2002 (Leave Entitlement).
  Authorization: Ensure that you have the necessary permissions to make changes to employee records.
  Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or your organization's HR policies for specific guidelines on managing employee absences and interdictions.
  Testing: After making changes, it may be beneficial to test the changes in a development or test environment before applying them in production.
  
  If the issue persists after following these steps, it may be necessary to consult with your SAP support team or a technical consultant for further assistance.