How To Fix HRPAYDEPF320 - Garnishment &1/&2: Difference seizable amount (&3) exists in period &4

HRPAYDEPF320 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPAYDEPF - Error messages for German infotype module pools: garnishment

• Message number: 320

• Message text: Garnishment &1/&2: Difference seizable amount (&3) exists in period &4

What causes this issue?

The repaid amount of the garnishment (&v1&/&v2&) changes in the period
&v4& during the cleanup. At the same time, the seizable amount changes
by &v3& EUR. In constrast to message 309, the amount of the change is
smaller than or equal to the limit amount <LS>A_PFBB_MAX</>.
The limit amount <LS>A_PFBB_MAX</> is to be defined so that it
corresponds to the amount up to which a change of the seizable amount is
to be tolerated.

System Response

This is only an information message and has no effect on the status of
the personnel number.

How to fix this error?

You can specify the limit amounts. See the report documentation.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message HRPAYDEPF320 - Garnishment &1/&2: Difference seizable amount (&3) exists in period &4 ?

  The SAP error message HRPAYDEPF320 typically relates to garnishments in payroll processing. This error indicates that there is a discrepancy in the seizable amount for a garnishment during a specific payroll period. Here’s a breakdown of the components of the error message and potential solutions:
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Seizable Amount Discrepancy: The error suggests that the seizable amount for the garnishment (the amount that can be legally withheld from an employee's wages) does not match the expected amount for the specified period. This could be due to:
  
  Incorrect configuration of garnishment rules.
  Changes in the employee's salary or deductions that were not properly accounted for.
  Manual entries or adjustments that have created inconsistencies.
  
  
  
  Payroll Processing Issues: If there were changes in the employee's payroll data (like salary changes, bonuses, or other deductions) that were not reflected in the garnishment calculations, this could lead to discrepancies.
  
  
  Data Entry Errors: Mistakes in entering garnishment amounts or related payroll data can also