How To Fix ACE_RECON038 - Field STATUS of ACEPSOH and ACEV_ACEPSOH is not equal for &1/&2.

ACE_RECON038 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: ACE_RECON - Accrual Engine migration: Messages from reconciliation

• Message number: 038

• Message text: Field STATUS of ACEPSOH and ACEV_ACEPSOH is not equal for &1/&2.

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message ACE_RECON038 - Field STATUS of ACEPSOH and ACEV_ACEPSOH is not equal for &1/&2. ?

  The SAP error message ACE_RECON038 indicates a discrepancy between the STATUS fields of the tables ACEPSOH and ACEV_ACEPSOH for the specified entries (represented by &1 and &2). This error typically arises in the context of the SAP Asset Accounting (FI-AA) module, particularly when reconciling asset transactions.
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Data Inconsistency: The most common cause of this error is a data inconsistency between the two tables. This can happen due to:
  
  Manual changes to asset records that were not properly updated in both tables.
  Issues during data migration or system upgrades that led to mismatched statuses.
  Errors during posting or processing of asset transactions.
  
  
  
  Transaction Errors: If there were errors during the posting of asset transactions, it could lead to one table being updated while the other is not.
  
  
  Custom Developments: If there are custom programs or enhancements that manipulate asset data, they might not be updating both tables correctly.
  
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Data Consistency Check: 
  
  Perform a consistency check between the two