Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: 32 - HR: Public Sector Austria
Message number: 080
Message text: Version numbers of cluster &1 are incompatible (payr. period = &2)
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
32080
- Version numbers of cluster &1 are incompatible (payr. period = &2) ?The SAP error message "32080 Version numbers of cluster &1 are incompatible (payr. period = &2)" typically occurs in the context of payroll processing within the SAP system. This error indicates that there is a mismatch between the version numbers of the payroll cluster data and the expected version for the specified payroll period.
Cause:
- Version Mismatch: The payroll cluster (e.g., PC_PAYRESULT) has a version number that does not match the version expected for the payroll period specified. This can happen if there have been changes to the payroll schema or if the payroll results have not been updated correctly.
- Data Inconsistency: If there have been changes in the configuration or if the payroll results were not processed correctly, it can lead to inconsistencies in the version numbers.
- Transport Issues: If the system has recently undergone a transport of changes related to payroll processing, it may lead to version mismatches if the transport was not executed properly.
Solution:
- Check Payroll Results: Review the payroll results for the specified period to ensure that they have been processed correctly. You can use transaction code PC_PAYRESULT to view the payroll results.
- Reprocess Payroll: If the payroll results are inconsistent, you may need to reprocess the payroll for the affected period. This can be done using transaction code PC00_M99_CALC or the appropriate payroll processing transaction for your country.
- Check Configuration: Ensure that the payroll configuration is consistent and that any recent changes have been properly implemented. This includes checking the payroll schema and any related infotypes.
- Transport Management: If the issue arose after a transport, ensure that all necessary transports have been executed in the correct order and that the target system is in sync with the source system.
- Consult Documentation: Review SAP Notes and documentation related to payroll processing for any known issues or updates that may address this error.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to identify the cause of the error and implement a solution to resolve it.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
32079
Employee leaving pay scale level &1 &2 on &3
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
32078
Employee joining pay scale level &1 &2 on &3
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
32081
Employee is absent on &1 with absence category &2 (no increase)
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
32082
There is already a reassignment on & before the next increase
What causes this issue? &V2& was determined as the date of the next increase. However, a basic pay record with a new assignment already exist...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.