How To Fix SRM_ORGANIZER203 - A role definition already exists for & in RMS & - overwrite?

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SRM_ORGANIZER - SAP Records Organizer Error Messages

• Message number: 203

• Message text: A role definition already exists for & in RMS & - overwrite?

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message SRM_ORGANIZER203 - A role definition already exists for & in RMS & - overwrite? ?

  The SAP error message SRM_ORGANIZER203 indicates that there is an attempt to create or modify a role definition in the SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) system, but a role definition for the specified entity already exists in the Role Management System (RMS). The message typically includes a placeholder for the role name and the RMS identifier.
  Cause:
  The error occurs when:
  
  You are trying to create a new role definition with the same name as an existing one.
  There is a conflict in the role definitions due to duplicate entries.
  The system is set to prevent overwriting existing role definitions without explicit confirmation.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Check Existing Role Definitions:
  
  Navigate to the Role Management System (RMS) and check for existing role definitions that match the one you are trying to create.
  If you find an existing role that you do not need, you can delete or modify it.
  
  
  
  Overwrite the Existing Role:
  
  If you want to overwrite the existing role definition, you may need to confirm this action. Look for an option in the interface that allows you to overwrite or update the existing role.
  Ensure that you have the necessary permissions to perform this action.
  
  
  
  Modify the Role Name:
  
  If you do not want to overwrite the existing role, consider creating a new role with a different name to avoid the conflict.
  
  
  
  Consult Documentation:
  
  Refer to the SAP documentation or help resources for specific instructions on managing role definitions in SRM.
  
  
  
  Check for System Notes:
  
  Sometimes, there may be system notes or patches available that address specific issues related to role management. Check the SAP Support Portal for any relevant notes.
  
  
  
  Contact SAP Support:
  
  If the issue persists and you cannot resolve it, consider reaching out to SAP Support for further assistance.
  
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Role Management in SRM: Understanding how roles are defined and managed in SAP SRM can help prevent such conflicts. Familiarize yourself with the role creation and modification processes.
  User Permissions: Ensure that you have the appropriate permissions to create or modify roles in the system.
  System Configuration: Sometimes, system settings may restrict certain actions. Review the configuration settings related to role management.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the SRM_ORGANIZER203 error and manage your role definitions effectively.