Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: NAA - Subsequent settlement (Purchasing)
Message number: 331
Message text: Settlement schema &1 is the same as price determ. schema (not allowed)
For the settlement schema (&V1&), you entered the same schema as for
price determination in purchasing for purchase orders, supplier billing
documents or settlement documents.
This is not allowed, as settlement schemas are structured differently.
Assign a different settlement schema. If necessary, contact your system
administrator.
For information on the structure of schemas, see the IMG.
<DS><DS:SIMG.SIMG_CFMENUOLMEKONDT>Set Up Condition Technique for
Subsequent Settlement (subpoint Maintain Settlement Schema for Subseque
nt Settlement)</>
ENDIF
You can assign the schema directly to the arrangment type, or to
individual suppliers via the purchasing organization (supplier
arrangements only).
Assignment of arrangement type &V4& in Customizing
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
<DS:SIMG.SIMG_CFMENUOLMEOMHD>Define Rebate Arrangement Types forError message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
NAA331
- Settlement schema &1 is the same as price determ. schema (not allowed) ?The SAP error message NAA331 indicates that there is a conflict between the settlement schema and the price determination schema in the configuration of your SAP system. Specifically, it means that the settlement schema you are trying to use is the same as the price determination schema, which is not allowed in SAP.
Cause:
- Configuration Conflict: The error arises when the system detects that the settlement schema (used for settling costs) is identical to the price determination schema (used for determining prices). This is not permitted because it can lead to inconsistencies in financial calculations and reporting.
- Incorrect Assignment: The assignment of schemas in the configuration settings may have been done incorrectly, leading to this overlap.
Solution:
To resolve this error, you need to ensure that the settlement schema and the price determination schema are different. Here are the steps to do that:
Access Configuration:
- Go to the SAP Easy Access screen.
- Navigate to the configuration settings for the relevant module (e.g., Controlling (CO) or Materials Management (MM)).
Check Schema Assignments:
- Look for the settings related to settlement and price determination schemas. This is typically found under the configuration for the specific module you are working with (e.g., for CO, it might be under "Product Costing" or "Internal Orders").
- Identify the current schemas assigned for both settlement and price determination.
Modify Schema Assignments:
- Change the settlement schema to a different one that does not conflict with the price determination schema.
- Ensure that the new settlement schema is correctly configured and meets the requirements for your business processes.
Save Changes: After making the necessary changes, save your configuration.
Test the Changes: After saving, perform a test transaction to ensure that the error no longer occurs and that the system behaves as expected.
Related Information:
OKB9
(for settlement profiles) or OKB2
(for price determination) to access the relevant configuration settings.By ensuring that the settlement schema and price determination schema are distinct, you should be able to resolve the NAA331 error and proceed with your transactions without further issues.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
NAA330
Tax code (tax-exempt tranaction output tax) missing for company code &
What causes this issue? The condition record for condition type &V3& is to be settled independent of business volume. The tax code for non-ta...
NAA329
Tax code (tax-free transaction input tax) of company code &1 missing
What causes this issue? The condition record for condition type &V3& is to be settled independent of business volume. The tax code for non-ta...
NAA332
Business vol. data of type "&1" is only allowed for main condit. records
What causes this issue? Function module "&V2&" can be called with respect to the type of business volume data (&V1&) for ma...
NAA333
Actual data is used for period &3 - &4 (no comparison yet)
What causes this issue? Up to now, one periodic business volume comparison has been carried out for the period (condition type &V1&, validity...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.