Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: MN - Message class for subsequent settlement (Purchasing)
Message number: 527
Message text: No subsequent business volume was determined for the condition record
For the condition record of arrangement &V1&, there is a worklist of
document items that need to be looked at in relation to the subsequent
business volume update.
However, none of these document items is relevant for the condition
record of arrangement &V1&.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
See the analyis log. This contains the reasons why the document items
were not processed.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
MN527
- No subsequent business volume was determined for the condition record ?The SAP error message MN527 ("No subsequent business volume was determined for the condition record") typically occurs in the context of pricing and condition records in SAP, particularly when dealing with pricing conditions in sales and distribution (SD) or materials management (MM). This error indicates that the system could not find any subsequent business volume that corresponds to the condition record you are trying to access or process.
Causes:
- Missing Condition Records: The condition records for the pricing procedure may not be maintained correctly or are missing entirely.
- Incorrect Condition Type: The condition type being used may not be set up properly or may not be relevant for the transaction being processed.
- Data Inconsistencies: There may be inconsistencies in the master data (like customer, material, or vendor data) that prevent the system from determining the business volume.
- Incorrect Configuration: The pricing procedure or access sequence may not be configured correctly, leading to the inability to find the necessary condition records.
- Transaction Type Issues: The transaction type being used may not be compatible with the condition records available.
Solutions:
- Check Condition Records: Verify that the necessary condition records are created and maintained correctly. You can do this using transaction codes like
VK11
(Create Condition) orVK12
(Change Condition).- Review Pricing Procedure: Ensure that the pricing procedure assigned to the sales document or purchase order is correct and that it includes the relevant condition types.
- Access Sequence: Check the access sequence for the condition type to ensure it is set up to find the correct condition records based on the criteria defined.
- Master Data Verification: Ensure that the master data (customer, material, vendor) is complete and accurate. Check for any missing or incorrect entries that could affect pricing.
- Transaction Type Compatibility: Confirm that the transaction type you are using is compatible with the condition records you have set up.
- Debugging: If the issue persists, consider using the debugging tools in SAP to trace the pricing determination process and identify where it fails.
Related Information:
VK11
, VK12
, VK13
(for condition records), and V/06
(for pricing procedure).If the problem continues after checking these areas, it may be beneficial to consult with your SAP support team or a functional consultant who specializes in SD or MM modules for further assistance.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
MN526
Different condition record determined as per update date
What causes this issue? The update for document &V2&, item number &V3&, has already been carried out for a condition record (internal...
MN525
No PO history exists for purchasing document &, item &
What causes this issue? No purchase order history exists for purchasing document &V1&, item &V2&, which means that the system found n...
MN528
Normal update of supplier business volumes missing
What causes this issue? The condition is included in the document conditions of item &V2& of document &V1&. Translation: &V3&...
MN529
Update date redetermined (retrospective update)
What causes this issue? The condition was inserted retrospectively and is therefore not included in the document conditions of item &V3&, bel...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.