How To Fix MN526 - Different condition record determined as per update date

MN526 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: MN - Message class for subsequent settlement (Purchasing)

• Message number: 526

• Message text: Different condition record determined as per update date

What causes this issue?

The update for document &V2&, item number &V3&, has already been carried
out for a condition record (internal number &V4&). However, the latter
does not match up with the update date &V1& (i.e. the update date does
not lie within the validity period of the period condition record).

System Response

The function was performed with update date &V1&.
Apart from possibly delaying the settlement accounting process, the
error in the assignment of supplier business volumes to period condition
record has no effect on the computation of the rebate income due.

How to fix this error?

Look into this matter. The situation may be due to one of the following
reasons:

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

During the retrospective compilation of statistics, other update data
was determined in the course of an earlier update run than that
determined during the current run. For example<(>,<)>
because the validity period of the rebate arrangement - and thus of the
associated condition records - has changed.
because further period condition records have been created.
Otherwise there is a bug in the program. If necessary, contact your
system administrator.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message MN526 - Different condition record determined as per update date ?

  The SAP error message MN526 ("Different condition record determined as per update date") typically occurs in the context of pricing and condition records in SAP, particularly when dealing with pricing conditions in sales documents or purchase orders. This error indicates that the system has found multiple condition records for the same condition type, but they are valid for different update dates, leading to ambiguity in determining which condition record should be applied.
  
  Cause:
  
  Multiple Condition Records: There are multiple condition records for the same condition type (e.g., pricing, discounts) that are valid for different time periods.
  Update Date Confusion: The system is unable to determine which condition record to use because the update date of the condition records overlaps or is not clear.
  Incorrect Configuration: The configuration of condition records may not be set up correctly, leading to conflicts in the determination process.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Condition Records:
  
  Go to the transaction code VK13 (Display Condition) or VK11