How To Fix LTR2_ES_CHECK191 - Different rules defined for table field '&1' in ES and in RAS

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: LTR2_ES_CHECK - LTR2 Checks on Embedded Specification

• Message number: 191

• Message text: Different rules defined for table field '&1' in ES and in RAS

What causes this issue?

Different rules defined for table field &1 in embedded specification and
in rule assignment set (RAS sequence number &V3&):
In ES: &V2&
In RAS: &V3&

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

Check the rule settings for correctness.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message LTR2_ES_CHECK191 - Different rules defined for table field '&1' in ES and in RAS ?

  The SAP error message LTR2_ES_CHECK191 indicates that there is a discrepancy between the rules defined for a specific table field in the Enterprise Structure (ES) and the rules defined in the Reporting and Analytics System (RAS). This typically occurs during the data transfer or integration processes where the data structures or rules in the two systems do not align.
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent Field Definitions: The field in question (&1) has different definitions or rules in the ES and RAS. This could be due to changes made in one system that were not replicated in the other.
  Configuration Issues: There may be configuration settings that are not aligned between the two systems, leading to different interpretations of the same field.
  Data Model Changes: If there have been recent changes to the data model in either the ES or RAS, it could lead to inconsistencies.
  Version Mismatch: If the systems are running different versions of the software, there may be inherent differences in how fields are defined.
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Field Definitions: Check the definitions of the field in both the ES and RAS. Ensure that they are consistent in terms of data type, length, and any associated rules or constraints.
  Synchronize Configurations: If there are discrepancies, update the configuration in one of the systems to match the other. This may involve modifying the data model or the rules associated with the field.
  Consult Documentation: Refer to the SAP documentation for both systems to understand the expected configurations and any recent changes that may have been made.
  Testing: After making changes, conduct tests to ensure that the error does not reoccur and that data can be transferred successfully between the two systems.
  Engage SAP Support: If the issue persists, consider reaching out to SAP support for assistance. They may provide insights specific to your version and configuration.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: You may need to use transaction codes like SE11 (Data Dictionary) to check the field definitions or SPRO (Customizing) to review configuration settings.
  Change Logs: Review change logs or transport requests to identify any recent changes that may have led to this inconsistency.
  Documentation: Keep documentation of the changes made for future reference and to assist in troubleshooting similar issues.
  
  By addressing the discrepancies between the two systems, you should be able to resolve the error and ensure smooth data integration.