How To Fix HRPAYDESV771 - Company number of grouping of &1 to &2 are different.

HRPAYDESV771 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPAYDESV - Error Messages Germany Payroll, Social Insurance

• Message number: 771

• Message text: Company number of grouping of &1 to &2 are different.

What causes this issue?

Personnel area/subarea &V1& is grouped in personnel area &V2&. However,
the company numbers of the two personnel areas is different. It is also
possible that one of the company numbers has not been entered.

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Personnel area/subarea &V1&
with company number &V3&
Reporting personnel area &V2&
with company number &V4&

How to fix this error?

Ungroup the personnel area/subarea and ensure that only personnel areas
with the same company numbers can be grouped.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

HRPAYDESV771 - Details

• The SAP error message HRPAYDESV771 indicates that there is a mismatch in the company number of the grouping between two specified entities (denoted as &1 and &2). This error typically arises in the context of payroll processing or when dealing with employee data that is associated with different company codes or groupings.
  
  Cause:
  
  Mismatched Company Codes: The error usually occurs when the payroll data or employee records are being processed for different company codes that are not aligned or do not share the same grouping.
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be configuration issues in the payroll settings or in the organizational structure that lead to inconsistencies in how company codes are grouped.
  Data Entry Errors: Incorrect data entry when setting up employee records or payroll configurations can lead to this error.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Company Code Grouping: Verify the company code grouping settings in the SAP system. Ensure that the company codes for the entities involved are correctly