How To Fix HRITFPFXX001 - Attribute Class &1 According to T5CAS not Compatible with Field No. &3

HRITFPFXX001 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRITFPFXX - Message Class for Pension Fund

• Message number: 001

• Message text: Attribute Class &1 According to T5CAS not Compatible with Field No. &3

What causes this issue?

The attribute class &V1& entered in the infotype for the employee
attribute field number &V3& does not match attribute class &V2& that is
stored in the view V_T5CAS (Assign EE Attribute Classes to IT Fields)
for this field number

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

In the infotype record, use the attribute class &V2& for this field
number or contact your system administrator.

Procedure for System Administrators

Use the view V_T5CAS to assign the attribute class &V1& to the field
number &V3&.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

HRITFPFXX001 - Details

• The SAP error message HRITFPFXX001 indicates that there is a compatibility issue between an attribute class and a specific field in the context of the SAP HR module, particularly when dealing with infotypes and their attributes. This error typically arises during the processing of personnel administration or payroll data.
  
  Cause:
  The error message is triggered when:
  
  The attribute class specified in the configuration (T5CAS table) does not match the expected data type or format for the field number indicated in the error message.
  There may be a mismatch in the configuration settings for the infotype or the attribute class that is being used.
  The field number may not be correctly defined or may not exist in the context of the infotype being processed.
  
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you can follow these steps:
  
  
  Check Configuration in T5CAS:
  
  Go to transaction code SE11 (Data Dictionary) and check the table T5CAS.
  Verify that the attribute class defined for the infotype is correct