How To Fix FKKBIX2365 - Consumption item &1 set to reversed due to duplicate check &2

FKKBIX2365 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FKKBIX2 - Billing in Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable

• Message number: 365

• Message text: Consumption item &1 set to reversed due to duplicate check &2

What causes this issue?

The aforementioned rated consumption item has been recognized as a
duplicate.

System Response

To prevent the further processing of an item its
<DS:DE.RATINGREVERSED_KK>rating status</> is flagged as ?reversed?. It
is not possible to rate this item again.
In accordance with the <DS:DE.CIT4_DCPROCRULE_KK>
<DS:DE.CIT4_DCPROCRULE_KK>duplicate check</></> <DS:DE.CIT_DCSCHEMA_KK>
<DS:DE.CIT4_DCPROCRULE_KK>processing rule</></>, a reversal request is
created for the associated billable item.

How to fix this error?

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

FKKBIX2365 - Details

• The SAP error message FKKBIX2365 indicates that a consumption item has been set to reversed due to a duplicate check. This typically occurs in the context of financial transactions, particularly in the area of asset accounting or when dealing with consumption items in SAP.
  
  Cause:
  The error arises when the system detects that a consumption item (identified by the unique identifier &1) is being processed in a way that violates the duplicate check rules defined in the system. This can happen for several reasons, including:
  
  Duplicate Entries: The same consumption item is being processed multiple times, which the system flags as a potential error to prevent double counting or incorrect financial reporting.
  Configuration Settings: The duplicate check settings in the system may be too strict or not properly configured, leading to legitimate transactions being flagged as duplicates.
  Timing Issues: If transactions are processed in quick succession, the system may not have updated its records in