Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CNV_20100 - Messageclass for chart of account conversion
Message number: 174
Message text: Priority indicator set more than once at B level for &1 &2 in CoAr &3
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
CNV_20100174
- Priority indicator set more than once at B level for &1 &2 in CoAr &3 ?The SAP error message CNV_20100174 indicates that there is an issue with the priority indicator being set more than once at the B level for a specific object in the context of a conversion or migration process. This error typically arises during data migration activities, particularly when using SAP's Conversion Tools or during the execution of a data migration project.
Cause:
The error occurs when the system detects that the priority indicator for a specific object (identified by &1 and &2) has been assigned multiple times at the B level in the conversion area (CoAr &3). This can happen due to:
- Duplicate Entries: There may be duplicate entries in the data being processed, leading to conflicting priority indicators.
- Incorrect Configuration: The configuration settings for the migration process may not be set up correctly, causing the same priority to be assigned multiple times.
- Data Integrity Issues: The source data may have integrity issues, such as multiple records that should be unique.
Solution:
To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
Check for Duplicates: Review the data being processed to identify any duplicate entries that may be causing the conflict. Ensure that each object has a unique priority indicator.
Review Configuration: Examine the configuration settings for the migration process to ensure that the priority indicators are set correctly and that there are no conflicting rules.
Data Cleansing: If the source data has integrity issues, perform data cleansing to remove duplicates or correct any inconsistencies.
Adjust Priority Indicators: If necessary, adjust the priority indicators in the relevant records to ensure that each object has a single, unique priority indicator.
Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or notes related to the specific migration tool or process you are using for any additional guidance or known issues.
Testing: After making the necessary adjustments, re-run the migration process to verify that the error has been resolved.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to identify the root cause of the error and implement a solution to resolve it.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CNV_20100173
Mapping contains different significant lengths for target CoA &1
What causes this issue? The system found that in the activity <ZK>Specify Mapping Values (Chart of Accounts)</> in the view <ZK>Old...
CNV_20100172
Length of target acct or cost element &3 exceeds significant length of &4
What causes this issue? When checking the lengths of the target account and cost element IDs, the system found that in the mapping entry &V1&...
CNV_20100175
Other account &1 was also maintained in G/L account mapping
What causes this issue? The system found that the old account &V1&, which is contained in mapping table for 'other accounts', also ...
CNV_20100176
Other account &1 was also maintained in secondary cost element mapping
What causes this issue? The system found that the old account &V1&, which is contained in mapping table for 'other accounts', also...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.