How To Fix CNV_20100176 - Other account &1 was also maintained in secondary cost element mapping

CNV_20100176 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CNV_20100 - Messageclass for chart of account conversion

• Message number: 176

• Message text: Other account &1 was also maintained in secondary cost element mapping

What causes this issue?

The system found that the old account &V1&, which is contained in
mapping table for 'other accounts', also appears as an old secondary
cost element in the mapping table for old and new secondary cost
elements.

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

System Response

This is not allowed. The account is a secondary cost element and
consequently cannot be included in the mapping table for other accounts.

How to fix this error?

Delete the account &V1& from the mapping table for 'other accounts'.
&ADDITIONAL_HINTS&
Note that no further consistency checks will be made while this
inconsistency in the mapping table exists.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

CNV_20100176 - Details

• The SAP error message CNV_20100176 indicates that there is a conflict in the secondary cost element mapping during a migration or data conversion process. This error typically arises when the system detects that an account has been maintained in the secondary cost element mapping more than once, which can lead to inconsistencies in financial reporting and data integrity.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Entries: The primary cause of this error is the presence of duplicate entries for the same account in the secondary cost element mapping table. This can happen if the mapping was not properly maintained or if there were errors during data entry.
  Incorrect Configuration: There may be incorrect configurations in the mapping settings that lead to multiple accounts being assigned to the same secondary cost element.
  Data Migration Issues: If you are migrating data from another system or performing a conversion, the source data may have inconsistencies that result in duplicate mappings.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Mapping Entries: