How To Fix CKMLMV024 - Material sucessfully costed with reduced BOM

CKMLMV024 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CKMLMV - Message class for quantity structure tool

• Message number: 024

• Message text: Material sucessfully costed with reduced BOM

What causes this issue?

You have performed multi-level price determination with the indicator
<DS:DE.CKML_CUTBOM>Reduced actual BOM</>.

System Response

An error occured in the first step with at least one procurement
alternative when costing the material (negative price or a change that
exceeded the percentage threshold, for example).
The actual BOM was reduced for this procurement alternative so that the
material price can be determined sucessfully with multi-level price
determination.

How to fix this error?

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CKMLMV024 - Material sucessfully costed with reduced BOM ?

  The SAP error message CKMLMV024 indicates that a material has been successfully costed, but the system has used a reduced Bill of Materials (BOM) for the costing process. This typically occurs in the context of Material Ledger (ML) and can be related to various factors in the costing process.
  
  Cause:
  
  BOM Changes: The BOM for the material may have been changed or reduced, leading to a situation where not all components are included in the costing.
  Costing Variant Settings: The settings in the costing variant may allow for the use of a reduced BOM under certain conditions.
  Material Master Data: The material master data may not be correctly set up, leading to discrepancies in the BOM used for costing.
  Version Control: If there are multiple versions of the BOM, the system may have defaulted to a version that is incomplete or reduced.
  Costing Run Parameters: The parameters set during the costing run may have specified the