Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CACSMD - Message Texts for Master Data
Message number: 250
Message text: * Authorizations
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
CACSMD250
- * Authorizations ?The SAP error message CACSMD250 typically relates to authorization issues within the SAP system, particularly in the context of the SAP Customer Activity Repository (CAR) or SAP Customer Management (CACS). This error indicates that the user does not have the necessary authorizations to perform a specific action or access certain data.
Cause:
- Missing Authorizations: The user lacks the required authorizations in their role/profile to access the transaction or data they are trying to work with.
- Role Configuration: The roles assigned to the user may not be properly configured to include the necessary authorizations.
- Authorization Objects: Specific authorization objects related to the transaction or data access may not be included in the user's profile.
- User Status: The user may be inactive or not properly set up in the system.
Solution:
- Check User Roles: Verify the roles assigned to the user in transaction
SU01
(User Maintenance). Ensure that the user has the appropriate roles that include the necessary authorizations.- Review Authorization Objects: Use transaction
SU53
immediately after encountering the error to check which authorization objects are missing. This transaction provides a detailed report of the last authorization check.- Adjust Role Configuration: If the necessary authorizations are missing, you may need to adjust the role configuration in transaction
PFCG
(Role Maintenance) to include the required authorization objects.- Consult with Security Team: If you do not have the necessary permissions to make changes, contact your SAP security team or administrator to review and update the user's authorizations.
- Testing: After making changes, have the user log out and log back in to ensure that the new authorizations take effect.
Related Information:
SU01
: User MaintenancePFCG
: Role MaintenanceSU53
: Display Authorization CheckIf the issue persists after following these steps, further investigation may be required, potentially involving SAP support or a deeper analysis of the authorization setup in your system.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CACSMD241
No retroactive changes possible for selected version
What causes this issue? You tried to change an inactive contract version. However, only the last active contract version can be changed.System Respon...
CACSMD240
* Changes with retroactive effect
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
BP785
Cover eligibility relationships are being demanded
What causes this issue? When posting cover eligibility relationships are used, that is cross assignments are generated on other elements.Error messag...
BP786
Deleting cover eligibility profile &1 not allowed
What causes this issue? You want to delete cover eligibility profile &V1&. However, this is not possible, as it is still assigned to at least...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.