Do you have any question about this error?
Stop googling SAP errors. Use our Free Essentials plan instead - no credit card needed. Start Now →
Message type: E = Error
Message class: UE - Messages in the user and authorizations environment
Message number: 135
Message text: Permissible activities not maintained for field ACTVT for object &1
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
UE135
- Permissible activities not maintained for field ACTVT for object &1 ?The SAP error message UE135 "Permissible activities not maintained for field ACTVT for object &1" typically occurs when there is a missing configuration for the authorization object in the SAP system. This error indicates that the system is unable to determine the permissible activities (ACTVT) for a specific authorization object, which is necessary for the user to perform certain actions.
Cause:
- Missing Authorization Object Configuration: The authorization object specified in the error message does not have any permissible activities defined for the field ACTVT.
- User Role Issues: The user may not have the necessary roles assigned that include the required authorizations for the specified object.
- Transport Issues: If the configuration was recently transported from another system, it may not have been properly set up in the target system.
Solution:
Check Authorization Object Configuration:
- Go to transaction code SU21 to check the authorization object that is causing the issue.
- Verify if the object has the necessary activities defined for the field ACTVT. If not, you will need to maintain the permissible activities.
- Use transaction SU24 to check the default values for the authorization object in the relevant transaction.
Maintain Permissible Activities:
- If you have the necessary authorizations, you can maintain the permissible activities for the authorization object using transaction PFCG (Profile Generator).
- Navigate to the role that is associated with the user and add the necessary activities for the authorization object.
Assign Roles to User:
- Ensure that the user has the correct roles assigned that include the necessary authorizations for the object in question. You can check this in transaction SU01 (User Maintenance).
Transport Configuration:
- If the issue arose after a transport, ensure that all necessary configurations were included in the transport request and that they were imported correctly.
Testing:
- After making the necessary changes, test the transaction again to ensure that the error is resolved.
Related Information:
If the issue persists after following these steps, it may be necessary to consult with your SAP security team or a functional consultant for further investigation.
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
UE134
Object &1 does not have an object directory entry
What causes this issue? The specified object does not have an object directory entry.System Response The system issues an error message and will not...
UE133
Object &1 has already been exported (only restricted changes possible)
What causes this issue? The field list of an authorization object has a significant effect on the consistency of the authorization concepts. Changes ...
UE136
&1 already exists in object &2.
What causes this issue? An authorization field name can only be referenced once in an authorization object. Using authorization fields twice in the s...
UE137
Object name &1 does not match package &2
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.