How To Fix /SAPCND/DET005 - Table field &1 is missing in condition table &2 (access &3)

/SAPCND/DET005 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /SAPCND/DET -

• Message number: 005

• Message text: Table field &1 is missing in condition table &2 (access &3)

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

/SAPCND/DET005 - Details

• The SAP error message /SAPCND/DET005 Table field &1 is missing in condition table &2 (access &3) typically occurs in the context of condition tables used in pricing or other condition-based functionalities in SAP. This error indicates that a specific field (denoted by &1) is expected to be present in a condition table (denoted by &2) but is not found. The access sequence (denoted by &3) is also referenced, indicating where the issue is occurring.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Not Included: The field that is expected (e.g., a key field or a characteristic) is not included in the definition of the condition table.
  Incorrect Configuration: The condition table may have been configured incorrectly, or the field may have been removed or not added during the setup.
  Changes in Data Model: If there have been changes in the underlying data model (e.g., new fields added or existing fields removed), this can lead to discrepancies.
  Transport Issues: If the configuration