How To Fix /SAPAPO/CIF162 - Order &1 difference for ATP category: &2(APO) <-> &3

/SAPAPO/CIF162 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /SAPAPO/CIF -

• Message number: 162

• Message text: Order &1 difference for ATP category: &2(APO) <-> &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message /SAPAPO/CIF162 - Order &1 difference for ATP category: &2(APO) <-> &3 ?

  The SAP error message /SAPAPO/CIF162 typically occurs in the context of the Advanced Planning and Optimization (APO) module, particularly when dealing with the Core Interface (CIF) between SAP ERP and SAP APO. This error indicates a discrepancy in the order data related to Available-to-Promise (ATP) categories during the CIF transfer process.
  
  Cause:
  The error message /SAPAPO/CIF162 is triggered when there is a mismatch in the ATP category between the order data in the SAP ERP system and the corresponding data in the SAP APO system. This can happen due to several reasons, including:
  
  Data Inconsistency: The ATP category defined in the ERP system does not match the ATP category expected in the APO system.
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be configuration discrepancies in the ATP settings between the two systems.
  Master Data Issues: The material master or other related master data may not be correctly set up in one of the systems.
  Custom Development: If there are