How To Fix RP248 - New values for pay scale type/area/group/level: &1. Old values were &2

RP248 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RP - Error Messages for Infotype Module Pools

• Message number: 248

• Message text: New values for pay scale type/area/group/level: &1. Old values were &2

What causes this issue?

The values for pay scale type/area/group/level were changed from &V1&
&V2&.

System Response

The values set as defaults in the feature <ZH>TARIF</> and the entries
in the Employee Group/Subgroup table (T503) are used as the new values.
The values for pay scale group/level defined as defaults in the
'Planned Compensation' infotype (1005) will be used.
Values are changed when you use the 'copy' function. If you do not want
these values to be changed, please refer to the feature DFINF.

How to fix this error?

Determine whether you want to keep the old values, and if so, overwrite
the new ones.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message RP248 - New values for pay scale type/area/group/level: &1. Old values were &2 ?

  The SAP error message RP248 indicates that there is a mismatch between the pay scale type, area, group, or level that is being processed in the payroll or personnel administration module. This error typically occurs when there is an attempt to change the pay scale information for an employee, but the system detects that the new values do not match the existing values in the employee's master data.
  
  Cause:
  
  Data Inconsistency: The employee's master data may have been changed, but the payroll or personnel administration records have not been updated accordingly.
  Incorrect Input: The user may have entered incorrect values for the pay scale type, area, group, or level.
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be issues with the configuration of the pay scale structure in the system.
  Missing Authorizations: The user may not have the necessary authorizations to make changes to the pay scale data.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Master Data: Review the employee's master data in the infotype (e.g.,