How To Fix PG179 - No maintenance authorization for &1 at &2 &3 exists

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: PG - Error Messages for Master Data Programs

• Message number: 179

• Message text: No maintenance authorization for &1 at &2 &3 exists

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message PG179 - No maintenance authorization for &1 at &2 &3 exists ?

  The SAP error message PG179 "No maintenance authorization for &1 at &2 &3 exists" typically indicates that a user is trying to access or modify a particular object (like a table, view, or transaction) for which they do not have the necessary authorization. The placeholders (&1, &2, &3) usually represent the object type, the object name, and possibly the specific authorization group or area.
  Cause:
  
  Lack of Authorization: The user does not have the required authorization to perform the action on the specified object.
  Authorization Group Restrictions: The object may be restricted by an authorization group, and the user’s role does not include access to that group.
  Role Assignment Issues: The user may not have been assigned the correct roles or profiles that include the necessary authorizations.
  Changes in Authorization: Recent changes in the authorization roles or profiles may have removed access to the object.
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check User Authorizations:
  
  Use transaction code SU53 immediately after the error occurs to see what authorization checks failed.
  Review the user’s roles and profiles in transaction SU01 or PFCG.
  
  
  
  Modify Roles:
  
  If the user lacks the necessary authorization, you may need to modify their roles in transaction PFCG to include the required authorizations for the object in question.
  Ensure that the authorization objects related to the specific action (like S_TABU_DIS for table access) are included in the user’s roles.
  
  
  
  Authorization Group:
  
  If the object is restricted by an authorization group, ensure that the user has access to that group. This can be done by adding the user to the appropriate authorization group in the role.
  
  
  
  Consult with Security Team:
  
  If you are not authorized to make changes to roles or if you are unsure about the necessary authorizations, consult with your SAP security team or administrator.
  
  
  
  Testing:
  
  After making changes, have the user log out and log back in to ensure that the new authorizations take effect. Test the action again to confirm that the issue is resolved.
  
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes:
  
  SU01: User Maintenance
  PFCG: Role Maintenance
  SU53: Display Authorization Check
  
  
  Authorization Objects: Familiarize yourself with relevant authorization objects that may be involved in the error, such as S_TABU_DIS for table access or S_TCODE for transaction access.
  Documentation: Review SAP documentation or internal guidelines on authorization management to ensure compliance with security policies.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify the cause of the PG179 error and implement a solution to resolve it.