Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: MN - Message class for subsequent settlement (Purchasing)
Message number: 552
Message text: Subsequent settlement (scheduling agreement): Please check tax code
Scheduling agreement item &V3& is relevant to
<DS:GLOS.3526C095AFAB52B9E10000009B38F974>subsequent settlement</>.
Rebate arrangement types (for example, &V2&) exist that stipulate that
supplier business volume expressed as value is to be updated at the
time(s) of -&V1&- exist in the system.
The tax code in the scheduling agreement item must exist in the system
for this.
Depending on the type of this system message (warning, error), you may
be able to save the scheduling agreement. However, problems are likely
to arise in follow-on functions (see below).
Check the tax code. Without a tax code, it may not be possible to update
the cumulative supplier business volumes at the time of "PO/scheduling
agreement" or "goods receipt".
Since the price determination process does not take place until later,
the system cannot determine whether condition records requiring
subsequent settlement really are relevant to this item.
Posting the document without a tax code (in the event that this system
message is a warning) causes a message to appear in the workflow of the
employee responsible when the system tries to update the supplier
business volumes expressed as value.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
MN552
- Subsequent settlement (scheduling agreement): Please check tax code ?The SAP error message MN552, which states "Subsequent settlement (scheduling agreement): Please check tax code," typically occurs during the subsequent settlement process for scheduling agreements. This error indicates that there is an issue with the tax code associated with the transaction.
Cause:
- Invalid Tax Code: The tax code specified in the scheduling agreement or the related document may not be valid or may not exist in the system.
- Missing Tax Code: The tax code might not be assigned to the relevant material or vendor master data.
- Configuration Issues: There may be configuration issues in the tax settings within the SAP system, such as missing tax determination settings.
- Inconsistent Data: There could be inconsistencies in the data between the scheduling agreement and the related purchase order or invoice.
Solution:
Check Tax Code: Verify the tax code used in the scheduling agreement. Ensure that it is valid and correctly configured in the system.
- Go to the transaction code
OB40
to check the tax codes and their configurations.Review Material Master: Check the material master data to ensure that the tax code is correctly assigned.
- Use transaction code
MM03
to view the material master and check the tax classification.Vendor Master Data: Ensure that the vendor master data has the correct tax information.
- Use transaction code
XK03
to view the vendor master and check the tax classification.Configuration Settings: Review the tax configuration settings in the system to ensure that they are set up correctly.
- Check the tax determination settings in the configuration (transaction code
SPRO
).Recreate the Document: If the issue persists, consider recreating the scheduling agreement or the related documents to ensure that all data is consistent and correctly entered.
Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for more detailed information on tax code configuration and troubleshooting.
Related Information:
ME31L
(Create Scheduling Agreement), ME32L
(Change Scheduling Agreement), and ME33L
(Display Scheduling Agreement).By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the issue causing the MN552 error in SAP.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
MN551
Doc. condition and condition record have different reference magnitudes
What causes this issue? The document condition has the reference value &V1&, whereas the associated condition record has the reference value ...
MN550
Document condition and condition record have different calculation rules
What causes this issue? The document condition has the calculation rule &V1&, whereas the associated condition record has the calculation rul...
MN553
An active period condition record was not adopted
What causes this issue? A period condition record was not adopted in the extended rebate arrangement &V1& because the associated main conditi...
MN554
Period cond. record with deletion flag adopted (cond. record activated)
What causes this issue? A period condition record was adopted in the extended rebate arrangement &V1&, and activated despite the existence of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.