How To Fix KL105 - KEKO-KADKY &1 is not consistent with KEKO-BDATJ &2 and KEKO-POPER &3

KL105 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: KL - Valuation Function Modules: Activity Allocation

• Message number: 105

• Message text: KEKO-KADKY &1 is not consistent with KEKO-BDATJ &2 and KEKO-POPER &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message KL105 - KEKO-KADKY &1 is not consistent with KEKO-BDATJ &2 and KEKO-POPER &3 ?

  The SAP error message KL105 indicates a consistency issue in the costing data for a material or product. Specifically, it points out that the key date (KEKO-BDATJ) and the period (KEKO-POPER) for the costing data are not consistent with the data in the KEKO table. This can occur in various scenarios, such as when trying to perform a cost estimate or when there are discrepancies in the master data.
  
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent Key Date: The key date for the cost estimate may not match the expected date for the period or the data in the KEKO table.
  Period Issues: The period specified in the cost estimate may not align with the data available in the system.
  Master Data Changes: Changes in the master data (like material master or cost center) that have not been updated or are not reflected in the costing data.
  Costing Variant Issues: The costing variant used may not be set up correctly