How To Fix K6394 - Field &1 has the same meaning as field catalog field &2

K6394 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: K6 - EC-EIS/EC-BP data basis: Data entry and collection

• Message number: 394

• Message text: Field &1 has the same meaning as field catalog field &2

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message K6394 - Field &1 has the same meaning as field catalog field &2 ?

  The SAP error message K6394 indicates that there is a conflict in the field definitions within a report or a data structure. Specifically, it means that the field you are trying to use (denoted as field &1) has the same meaning or is redundant with another field (denoted as field &2) in the field catalog. This typically occurs in the context of reporting or data extraction where fields are defined in a way that they overlap in meaning or purpose.
  
  Cause:
  
  Redundant Field Definitions: The fields in the report or data structure are defined in such a way that they convey the same information, leading to confusion or redundancy.
  Incorrect Field Mapping: There may be an error in how fields are mapped or defined in the report, causing two fields to be interpreted as equivalent.
  
  Configuration Issues: There might be issues in the configuration of the report or data extraction settings that lead to