How To Fix HRPAYIEINFOTYPES265 - USC: Yearly Cut Off Point 2 is GREATER than Yearly Cut Off Point 3

HRPAYIEINFOTYPES265 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPAYIEINFOTYPES - Message class for all Irish Infotypes

• Message number: 265

• Message text: USC: Yearly Cut Off Point 2 is GREATER than Yearly Cut Off Point 3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

HRPAYIEINFOTYPES265 - Details

• The SAP error message HRPAYIEINFOTYPES265, which states "USC: Yearly Cut Off Point 2 is GREATER than Yearly Cut Off Point 3," typically occurs in the context of payroll processing, particularly when dealing with the Universal Social Charge (USC) in Ireland. This error indicates that there is a configuration issue with the yearly cut-off points for the USC tax bands.
  
  Cause:
  The error arises when the configuration for the USC cut-off points in the payroll settings is incorrect. Specifically, it means that the value set for Yearly Cut Off Point 2 is greater than the value set for Yearly Cut Off Point 3. This is logically incorrect because the cut-off points should be in ascending order, with Yearly Cut Off Point 2 being less than Yearly Cut Off Point 3.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you need to check and correct the configuration of the USC cut-off points in the SAP system. Here are the