How To Fix HRPADIN01384 - EDLI basissplits are not consistent in BAdI HR_IN_EPF_CONT

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPADIN01 - HR IN: Message class for HR India - Master Data

• Message number: 384

• Message text: EDLI basissplits are not consistent in BAdI HR_IN_EPF_CONT

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message HRPADIN01384 - EDLI basissplits are not consistent in BAdI HR_IN_EPF_CONT ?

  The SAP error message HRPADIN01384 indicates that there is an inconsistency in the EDLI (Employee Deposit Linked Insurance) basis splits within the BAdI (Business Add-In) HR_IN_EPF_CONT. This error typically arises during payroll processing when the system detects that the basis for calculating the EDLI contributions does not match the expected values or configurations.
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent Basis Splits: The error usually occurs when the basis for EDLI contributions is not properly split among different components or periods. This can happen due to incorrect configuration or data entry in the payroll master data.
  Incorrect Configuration: The configuration settings for the EDLI contributions in the payroll schema or the related infotypes may not be set up correctly.
  Data Entry Errors: There may be errors in the employee master data, such as incorrect values in infotypes related to salary, deductions, or contributions.
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Configuration: Review the configuration settings for EDLI in the payroll schema. Ensure that the basis for EDLI contributions is correctly defined and that the splits are set up according to the requirements.
  Review Infotypes: Check the relevant infotypes (e.g., IT0008 - Basic Pay, IT0014 - Recurring Payments/Deductions) for the employee in question. Ensure that the values entered are correct and consistent.
  Analyze BAdI Implementation: If there is a custom implementation of the BAdI HR_IN_EPF_CONT, review the code to ensure that it correctly handles the basis splits for EDLI contributions.
  Run Payroll Simulation: Perform a payroll simulation for the affected employee to identify any discrepancies in the calculations. This can help pinpoint where the inconsistency arises.
  Consult SAP Notes: Check for any relevant SAP Notes that may address this specific error or provide guidance on configuration and troubleshooting.
  
  Related Information:
  
  BAdI HR_IN_EPF_CONT: This BAdI is used for enhancing the processing of EPF (Employee Provident Fund) contributions, including EDLI. Understanding its implementation can help in troubleshooting.
  EDLI Contribution Rules: Familiarize yourself with the rules and regulations governing EDLI contributions in your region, as these may affect how the basis is calculated and split.
  SAP Community and Forums: Engage with the SAP community or forums for insights from other users who may have encountered similar issues.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the inconsistency causing the HRPADIN01384 error.