How To Fix FKKBW105 - Incorrect Customizing of field &1 (maintenance view &2)

FKKBW105 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FKKBW - Messages for BW Extraction

• Message number: 105

• Message text: Incorrect Customizing of field &1 (maintenance view &2)

trados = docu -> fi -> fica

What causes this issue?

The Customizing setting in maintenance view &V2& for field &V1& of
table &V3& is incorrect.

System Response

Processing continued without this field. This field will be empty in the
extract set.

How to fix this error?

Correct the settings in Customizing and remove the incorrect row from
the maintenance view or correct the entry of the source table and source
field.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message FKKBW105 - Incorrect Customizing of field &1 (maintenance view &2) ?

  The SAP error message FKKBW105 indicates that there is an issue with the customizing of a specific field in a maintenance view. This error typically arises when the configuration settings for a field do not align with the expected values or formats required by the system.
  
  Cause:
  
  Incorrect Configuration: The field in question may not be properly configured in the customizing settings. This could be due to incorrect data types, lengths, or other attributes that do not match the expected definitions.
  Missing Entries: There may be missing entries in the customizing tables that are required for the field to function correctly.
  Inconsistent Data: The data being entered or processed may not conform to the rules defined in the customizing settings, leading to validation errors.
  Transport Issues: If the customizing settings were transported from one system to another (e.g., from development to production), there may have been issues during the transport process that led to inconsistencies.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check