How To Fix FARR_CONTRACT_MAIN019 - Performance obligation &1 cannot have costing condition type &2

FARR_CONTRACT_MAIN019 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FARR_CONTRACT_MAIN - Revenue Accounting: Contract Management

• Message number: 019

• Message text: Performance obligation &1 cannot have costing condition type &2

What causes this issue?

When creating or updating a performance obligation, the back-end system
included a costing condition type. However, costing conditions can only
be assigned to performance obligations at the bottom level of the
hierarchy. This may have occurred because of an incorrect configuration
in the back-end system.
The system does not allow the following configurations of performance
obligations:
Costing conditions assigned to a compound performance obligation.
Costing conditions assigned to a performance obligation that is part of
a sales bill of material (BOM) structure and that is not a leaf node of
the BOM.

System Response

The operation to create or update the performance obligation was
terminated.

How to fix this error?

Contact your system administrator.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message FARR_CONTRACT_MAIN019 - Performance obligation &1 cannot have costing condition type &2 ?

  The SAP error message FARR_CONTRACT_MAIN019 indicates that there is an issue with the performance obligation in a contract related to costing condition types. This error typically arises in the context of SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting (RAR) when there is a mismatch or an incorrect configuration regarding the costing conditions associated with a performance obligation.
  
  Cause:
  
  Incorrect Configuration: The costing condition type specified for the performance obligation is not valid or not allowed in the context of the contract.
  Missing or Incorrect Assignment: The performance obligation may not be correctly assigned to the relevant costing condition type.
  Data Inconsistency: There may be inconsistencies in the data related to the performance obligation or the costing conditions in the system.
  Business Rules Violation: The business rules defined in the system may restrict the use of certain costing condition types for specific performance obligations.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Configuration: Review the configuration settings for the costing condition types and ensure that they