How To Fix CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK449 - Mandatory field &1 missing in characteristic persistence view view &2.

CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK449 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check

• Message number: 449

• Message text: Mandatory field &1 missing in characteristic persistence view view &2.

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK449 - Mandatory field &1 missing in characteristic persistence view view &2. ?

  The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK449 indicates that a mandatory field is missing in the characteristic persistence view. This error typically arises in the context of SAP's Custom Fields and Logic (CFL) or when working with the Business Technology Platform (BTP) and involves the configuration of custom fields.
  
  Cause:
  The error is caused by the absence of a required field in the characteristic persistence view. This can happen due to several reasons:
  
  Field Configuration: The field may not have been properly configured or defined in the system.
  Data Model Changes: Changes in the data model or the underlying database structure may have led to the removal or renaming of the mandatory field.
  Transport Issues: If the configuration was transported from one system to another, there may have been issues during the transport process that led to missing fields.
  Inconsistent Data: There may be inconsistencies in the data that prevent the system from recognizing the mandatory field.
  
  
  Solution:
  To resolve