Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check
Message number: 448
Message text: Text Path '&1' not unique; used also for View Field Name &2
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK448
- Text Path '&1' not unique; used also for View Field Name &2 ?The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK448 indicates that there is a conflict in the system where a specific path (denoted as '&1') is not unique because it is being used for another view field name (denoted as '&2'). This typically occurs in the context of configuration or data modeling within SAP, particularly when dealing with custom fields or views in the system.
Cause:
Non-Unique Path: The error arises when two or more fields or views are trying to use the same path name. This can happen if:
- Custom fields or views have been created without proper naming conventions.
- There are duplicate entries in the configuration or data model.
- Changes were made to the data model that were not properly reflected in the system.
Configuration Issues: It may also stem from incorrect configuration settings in the SAP system, where the same identifier is inadvertently assigned to multiple objects.
Solution:
Identify Conflicts:
- Use transaction codes like SE11 (Data Dictionary) or SE80 (Object Navigator) to search for the path and view field names mentioned in the error message.
- Check the configuration settings for the fields or views to identify where the duplication is occurring.
Rename or Reconfigure:
- If you find that the path is indeed being used by multiple fields, consider renaming one of the fields or changing the configuration to ensure that each path is unique.
- Ensure that any changes made are consistent across all relevant configurations and data models.
Check Custom Developments:
- If custom developments (like ABAP programs or enhancements) are involved, review the code to ensure that the paths are not being reused unintentionally.
Transport Requests: If the issue arose after a transport request, check if the transport included changes that might have caused the conflict. You may need to adjust the transport or revert changes.
Testing: After making the necessary changes, test the configuration to ensure that the error no longer occurs and that the system behaves as expected.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK448 error and ensure that your SAP system is configured correctly without path conflicts.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK447
Chosen View Type does not allow Characteristics relevant Context &1
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK446
Clear irrelevant Chacteristic Generic Persistence info for Context &1
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK449
Mandatory field &1 missing in characteristic persistence view view &2.
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK450
Mandatory Parameter P_KeyDate missing in original persistence view &1.
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.