How To Fix CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK218 - Position of direct union suffix &1 is different in branch &2 and &3.


SAP Error Message - Details

  • Message type: E = Error

  • Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check

  • Message number: 218

  • Message text: Position of direct union suffix &1 is different in branch &2 and &3.

  • Show details Hide details


  • Self-Explanatory Message

    Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

    To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

    Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.



    What else can you do?

    First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

    Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

    You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.


Smart SAP Assistant

  • What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK218 - Position of direct union suffix &1 is different in branch &2 and &3. ?

    The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK218 indicates a discrepancy in the position of a direct union suffix in different branches of a data structure. This typically occurs in the context of Composite Data Types (CDTs) or when working with ABAP structures that involve unions.

    Cause:

    The error arises when the same union suffix is defined in different branches of a structure, but the position of that suffix differs between those branches. This can lead to inconsistencies in how data is interpreted or accessed, which is why SAP raises this error.

    Solution:

    To resolve this error, you need to ensure that the position of the direct union suffix is consistent across all branches of the structure. Here are the steps you can take:

    1. Review the Structure Definition: Check the definition of the data structure where the error is occurring. Look for the union suffix and verify its position in each branch.

    2. Align the Positions: If you find that the positions of the union suffix differ, modify the structure definition to align them. Ensure that the union suffix appears in the same position across all branches.

    3. Recompile the Structure: After making the necessary changes, recompile the structure to ensure that the changes take effect.

    4. Test the Changes: Run tests to confirm that the error has been resolved and that the data structure behaves as expected.

    Related Information:

    • Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation on Composite Data Types and ABAP structures for more detailed information on how to define and manage data structures.
    • SAP Notes: Check for any relevant SAP Notes that might provide additional insights or solutions related to this error message.
    • Community Forums: Engage with SAP community forums or support channels where other users may have encountered and resolved similar issues.

    By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK218 error and ensure that your data structures are correctly defined.

    • Do you have any question about this error?


      Upgrade now to chat with this error.


Instant HelpGet instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.


Related SAP Error Messages

Click the links below to see the following related messages:

Click on this link to search all SAP messages.


Rating
ERPlingo simplifies finding the accurate answers to SAP message errors. I now use every week. A must have tool for anyone working with SAP! Highly recommended!
Rate 1
Kent Bettisworth
Executive SAP Consultant