How To Fix CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK133 - Name clashes as Business Context &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check

• Message number: 133

• Message text: Name clashes as Business Context &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK133 - Name clashes as Business Context &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same ?

  The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK133 indicates that there is a name clash in the Business Context of an underlying view. This typically occurs when two or more views or business contexts have the same name, which can lead to confusion in the system.
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Names: The primary cause of this error is that two or more views or business contexts have been defined with the same name. This can happen during the development process if developers are not careful about naming conventions.
  Transport Issues: If views are transported from one system to another (e.g., from development to production), and there are naming conflicts, this error can arise.
  Configuration Errors: Incorrect configuration or setup in the SAP system can also lead to this error.
  
  Solution:
  
  Identify Conflicting Names: Check the names of the business contexts and views mentioned in the error message. You can do this by navigating to the relevant transaction codes (like SE11 for Data Dictionary) and searching for the views.
  Rename Conflicting Views: If you find that there are indeed two views or business contexts with the same name, you will need to rename one of them to resolve the conflict. Ensure that the new name adheres to your organization’s naming conventions.
  Check Transport Requests: If the issue arose after a transport, check the transport requests to ensure that they did not inadvertently overwrite existing views or contexts.
  Clear Cache: Sometimes, clearing the cache can help resolve issues related to naming conflicts. You can do this by using transaction code /n/SM12 to delete any locks or /n/SM21 to check the system log for any related issues.
  Rebuild the View: If renaming does not resolve the issue, consider rebuilding the view or business context from scratch, ensuring that all names are unique.
  
  Related Information:
  
  SAP Notes: Check SAP Notes related to this error message for any patches or updates that may address the issue.
  Documentation: Review the SAP documentation for guidelines on naming conventions and best practices for creating views and business contexts.
  Community Forums: Engage with SAP community forums or support channels to see if others have encountered and resolved similar issues.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK133 error and prevent it from occurring in the future.