How To Fix CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK132 - Name clashes as union suffix &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check

• Message number: 132

• Message text: Name clashes as union suffix &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK132 - Name clashes as union suffix &1 of underlying View &2 and &3 is same ?

  The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK132 indicates that there is a name clash due to the union suffix of underlying views in a Composite Provider or a similar data model. This typically occurs when you are trying to create a Composite Provider that combines multiple InfoProviders (like InfoCubes, DataStore Objects, or other Composite Providers) and the union suffixes of the underlying views are the same.
  Cause:
  The error arises when:
  
  You have two or more underlying views (or InfoProviders) that have the same union suffix. 
  The system requires unique union suffixes to differentiate between the data being pulled from different sources.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Identify the Views: Check the underlying views mentioned in the error message. You will see the names of the views that are causing the conflict.
  
  
  Change Union Suffixes: 
  
  Go to the definition of the underlying views in the SAP BW system.
  Modify the union suffix of one or more of the conflicting views to ensure that they are unique. This can usually be done in the properties of the view.
  
  
  
  Rebuild the Composite Provider: After changing the union suffixes, you may need to rebuild or refresh the Composite Provider to ensure that the changes take effect.
  
  
  Test the Changes: After making the changes, test the Composite Provider to ensure that it is functioning correctly without any errors.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Union Suffix: This is a suffix that is added to the field names in a union operation to avoid name clashes. Each underlying view should have a unique suffix to ensure that the fields can be distinguished from one another.
  Composite Provider: A Composite Provider in SAP BW allows you to combine data from different sources into a single view, which can be used for reporting and analysis.
  SAP BW Modeling Tools: Use the SAP BW Modeling Tools in Eclipse to manage and modify your InfoProviders and Composite Providers.
  
  If you continue to face issues after following these steps, consider checking the SAP Notes or reaching out to SAP support for further assistance.