Message type: E = Error
Message class: 5D - Error Messages for German Infotype Module Pools
Message number: 661
Message text: (Obsolete) Last character of city is incorrect
This message is obsolete and should no longer be used.
It was used by the DUEVO address check.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
5D661
- (Obsolete) Last character of city is incorrect ?The SAP error message 5D661 ("Obsolete: Last character of city is incorrect") typically occurs when there is an issue with the formatting or content of the city name in an address field. This error is often related to the validation rules set for address data in SAP, particularly in relation to the last character of the city name.
Cause: Invalid Character: The last character of the city name may not conform to the expected format or character set. For example, it might be a special character or a number that is not allowed. Data Entry Error: There may have been a typographical error when entering the city name. Obsolete Data: The city name may be outdated or no longer recognized in the system, leading to validation failures.
Solution: Check the City Name: Review the city name for any invalid characters, especially the last character. Ensure it is a valid letter and conforms to the expected format. Correct
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
5D660
City of residence is not DUEVO-compliant (&)
What causes this issue? Character string "&V4& is not DEUEV-compliant. The system issues an error message and will not allow you to cont...
5D659
Postal code is not DUEVO-compliant (&)
What causes this issue? The DEUEV check of the postal code for error number &V1& failed. List of checks: <ZH>DBAN020</>: Valid po...
5D662
Address supplement is not DEUEV-compliant (&)
What causes this issue? Character string "&V4& is not DEUEV-compliant. The system issues an error message and will not allow you to cont...
5D663
SR difference amount in SI-exempt period (&1)
What causes this issue? An SR difference amount was entered manually using wage type MH80. There is no employment relationship subject to social insu...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.