How To Fix >3567 - Report stopped: JDC transfer already executed on &1 by user &2

>3567 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: >3 - Lock management messages

• Message number: 567

• Message text: Report stopped: JDC transfer already executed on &1 by user &2

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message >3567 - Report stopped: JDC transfer already executed on &1 by user &2 ?

  The SAP error message 3567 indicates that a job or report has been stopped because a JDC (Job Data Control) transfer has already been executed for the specified object by another user. This typically occurs in scenarios where multiple users are trying to execute the same job or report simultaneously, and the system prevents concurrent execution to maintain data integrity.
  
  Cause:
  
  Concurrent Execution: Another user has already executed the JDC transfer for the same job or report.
  Locking Mechanism: SAP uses a locking mechanism to prevent multiple instances of the same job from running at the same time, which can lead to data inconsistencies.
  User Session: The user who initiated the job may still have an active session that is holding the lock.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Active Sessions: Verify if the job is still running or if the user who executed it is still active. You can do this by checking transaction codes like SM37 (Job Monitoring)