How To Fix WXP544 - Different fiscal year variant for database table &1 in plng scenario &4

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: WXP - Retail Planning

• Message number: 544

• Message text: Different fiscal year variant for database table &1 in plng scenario &4

What causes this issue?

You are using database table &V1& in planning step &V2& of your
planning scenario. Table &V1& has already been used with the same
storage periodicity but a different fiscal year variant in step &V3& of
planning scenario &V4&.
This is, however, not advisable for reasons of consistency, regardless
of the period category (for example, month, posting period) that is
used.

How to fix this error?

Select the same fiscal year variant for your storage periodicity in all
planning scenarios and steps which contain table &V2&.
The storage periodicity and fiscal year variant is defined in the basic
settings for the planning step.

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message WXP544 - Different fiscal year variant for database table &1 in plng scenario &4 ?

  Certainly! Here's a detailed explanation for the SAP error message:
  
  SAP Error Message:
  WXP544 Different fiscal year variant for database table &1 in plng scenario &4
  
  Meaning / 
  Cause:
  This warning message occurs when there is an inconsistency in the fiscal year variant assigned to a particular database table (&1) within a planning (PLNG) scenario (&4). Specifically, the fiscal year variant defined in the system for the table does not match the fiscal year variant expected or used in the planning scenario.
  Fiscal year variants define the fiscal year structure (number of posting periods, special periods, start and end dates) and are critical for financial and controlling modules. If different fiscal year variants are used inconsistently, it can lead to incorrect period assignments, reporting errors, or planning inaccuracies.
  
  Typical Causes:
  
  The planning scenario (&4) is configured with a fiscal year variant different from the one assigned to the database table (&1).
  The database table is linked to master