How To Fix WRF_AT147 - Inconsistent data (routine: &1) when changing AT relevancy indicator

WRF_AT147 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: WRF_AT - Messages for Allocation Table RTFASH

• Message number: 147

• Message text: Inconsistent data (routine: &1) when changing AT relevancy indicator

What causes this issue?

You changed the allocation relevance indicator AUREL to &V3&. Your data
is probably inconsistent as a result.

System Response

The system cannot process the current data.

How to fix this error?

Check the changed allocation relevance indicator in the purchase order.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message WRF_AT147 - Inconsistent data (routine: &1) when changing AT relevancy indicator ?

  Certainly! Here's a detailed explanation regarding the SAP error message WRF_AT147: Inconsistent data (routine: &1) that occurs when changing the AT relevancy indicator:
  
  Error Message Overview
  
  Message ID: WRF_AT147
  Text: Inconsistent data (routine: &1)
  Context: This error typically appears when you try to change the Attendance (AT) relevancy indicator in personnel time data or related infotypes in SAP HR (HCM) Time Management.
  
  
  Cause
  The error WRF_AT147 occurs because the system detects inconsistent or conflicting data when you attempt to change the AT relevancy indicator. The AT relevancy indicator controls whether certain time data is relevant for attendance or absence processing.
  Common causes include:
  
  
  Data Inconsistency:
  The existing time data or infotype records are inconsistent with the new AT relevancy indicator setting. For example, if the system expects attendance data but finds absence data, or vice versa.
  
  
  Incorrect or Missing Customizing:
  The configuration for time evaluation or absence/attendance types may not be aligned with the changes you are trying to make.
  
  
  Dependencies in