How To Fix UJP_EXCEPTION059 - Value æ&1Æ in field &2 is not a valid node level member

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: UJP_EXCEPTION - BPC: Message Class for UJP Exception

• Message number: 059

• Message text: Value æ&1Æ in field &2 is not a valid node level member

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message UJP_EXCEPTION059 - Value æ&1Æ in field &2 is not a valid node level member ?

  The SAP error message UJP_EXCEPTION059 indicates that there is an issue with a value being used in a specific field that is not recognized as a valid node level member. This typically occurs in the context of SAP's planning and budgeting applications, such as SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) or SAP Integrated Business Planning (IBP).
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Invalid Node Level Member: The value being referenced (represented as &1) does not exist in the hierarchy or structure defined for the node level (represented as &2). This could be due to:
  
  Typographical errors in the value.
  The value not being included in the master data or hierarchy.
  Changes in the hierarchy that have not been reflected in the planning model.
  
  
  
  Data Model Issues: The data model may not be correctly set up, or there may be inconsistencies in the data that prevent the system from recognizing the value.
  
  
  Versioning Issues: If you are working with different versions of the