How To Fix UCFV112 - No intersection between selection and "Group By" in log

UCFV112 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: UCFV - Messages for Validation

• Message number: 112

• Message text: No intersection between selection and "Group By" in log

What causes this issue?

In the validation method that you have executed, you have activated the
<LS>Group By</> function. In the validation log for the current run, you
have selected to jump to the list in the totals database.
The intersection between this selection and the value for <LS>Group By
</>, below which the selection appears in the validation log, is empty.
Therefore, the system cannot display any totals data.

System Response

The system suppresses the opening of the window for the list in the
totals databse for the selection.

How to fix this error?

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message UCFV112 - No intersection between selection and "Group By" in log ?

  The SAP error message UCFV112 indicates that there is no intersection between the selection criteria and the "Group By" clause in a query or report. This typically occurs when the fields specified in the "Group By" clause do not match the fields in the selection criteria, leading to an inability to aggregate the data as intended.
  
  Cause:
  
  Mismatch in Fields: The fields used in the selection criteria do not correspond to the fields specified in the "Group By" clause. For example, if you are trying to group by a field that is not included in the selection criteria, the system cannot perform the aggregation.
  Empty Selection: The selection criteria may result in an empty set of data, which means there is nothing to group.
  Incorrect Query Logic: The logic of the query may be flawed, leading to a situation where the selected data does not align with the grouping requirements.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Selection Criteria: Check the