Do you have any question about this error?
Stop googling SAP errors. Use our Free Essentials plan instead - no credit card needed. Start Now →
Message type: E = Error
Message class: UAS -
Message number: 107
Message text: Definition of attribute groups is inconsistent. Not possible to save
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
UAS107
- Definition of attribute groups is inconsistent. Not possible to save ?The SAP error message UAS107, which states "Definition of attribute groups is inconsistent. Not possible to save," typically occurs in the context of managing attribute groups in SAP, particularly in the SAP Master Data Governance (MDG) or SAP Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) modules. This error indicates that there is an inconsistency in the definition of the attribute groups, which prevents the system from saving the changes.
Causes:
- Inconsistent Attribute Definitions: The attribute groups may have been defined with conflicting or incomplete attributes, leading to inconsistencies.
- Missing Required Fields: Some required fields in the attribute group may not have been filled out correctly or are missing.
- Data Type Mismatches: There may be mismatches in data types between the attributes defined in the group and the expected data types in the system.
- Configuration Issues: There could be issues in the configuration settings related to the attribute groups or the underlying data model.
- Transport Issues: If the attribute groups were transported from another system, there may be inconsistencies due to missing dependencies or configurations.
Solutions:
- Review Attribute Group Definitions: Go through the definitions of the attribute groups to ensure that all attributes are correctly defined and that there are no conflicts.
- Check Required Fields: Ensure that all required fields are filled out and that there are no missing mandatory attributes.
- Validate Data Types: Check that the data types of the attributes are consistent with what is expected in the system.
- Configuration Review: Review the configuration settings related to the attribute groups to ensure they are set up correctly.
- Transport Validation: If the issue arose after a transport, validate that all necessary objects and dependencies were included in the transport request.
- Use Transaction Codes: Utilize relevant transaction codes (like
SE11
for Data Dictionary,SE80
for Object Navigator) to check the definitions and configurations of the attribute groups.- Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or notes related to attribute groups for any specific guidelines or known issues.
Related Information:
If the problem persists after trying the above solutions, it may be beneficial to reach out to your SAP support team or consult with an SAP expert for further assistance.
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
UAS106
Method &1->&2 is used in formula &3
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
UAS105
Field &1 is already used in type &2
What causes this issue? The model version cannot contain any fields that are used in attribute groups, link types, or the posting level.System Respon...
UAS108
Field '&1' has different visibility from related unit field '&2'
What causes this issue? When an attribute group is assigned to an object type, the units or compound characteristics that belong to the fields of the...
UAS109
Field '&1' has different visibility from higher-level field '&2'
What causes this issue? When an attribute group is assigned to an object type, the units or compound characteristics that belong to the fields of the...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.