How To Fix TQ218 - Unexpected start time for upgrade was read from table UVERS (RFC)

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: TQ - SAPup Messages

• Message number: 218

• Message text: Unexpected start time for upgrade was read from table UVERS (RFC)

What causes this issue?

Inconsistency between the upgrade directory DIR_PUT and the database.

System Response

Error message from program SAPup

How to fix this error?

The time stamp was written by SAPup and is now being checked. The tp
connect probably connects to a database other than the one accessed by
RFC. Restart PREPARE from the beginning using "SAPup reset PREPARE" and
check manually that tp connects to the right database.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message TQ218 - Unexpected start time for upgrade was read from table UVERS (RFC) ?

  The SAP error message TQ218, which states "Unexpected start time for upgrade was read from table UVERS (RFC)," typically occurs during an upgrade process when there is a mismatch or inconsistency in the upgrade timing information stored in the database table UVERS. This table contains versioning information related to the upgrade process, and if the start time does not align with the expected values, it can lead to this error.
  Causes:
  
  Inconsistent Upgrade Data: The upgrade process may have been interrupted or not completed properly, leading to inconsistent data in the UVERS table.
  Database Issues: There may be issues with the database that prevent the correct reading of the upgrade start time.
  Configuration Errors: Incorrect configuration settings in the upgrade process can lead to unexpected values being read from the UVERS table.
  Multiple Upgrade Attempts: If multiple upgrade attempts are made without proper cleanup or rollback, it can lead to conflicts in the upgrade data.
  
  Solutions:
  
  Check