Do you have any question about this error?
Stop googling SAP errors. Use our Free Essentials plan instead - no credit card needed. Start Now →
Message type: E = Error
Message class: TBA1 - Messages for Treasury Basis Objects
Message number: 131
Message text: Tick value is too large
The system tried to calculate the new
<DS:DE.TBA_TICK_VALUE>tick value</>, but the result exceeded the size
of the corresponding data field.
Possible reasons:
A very large deviation between the unit of measure for the contract (for
example tons) and for the quotation (for example grams)
A very large
<DS:DE.TBA_TICK_AMNT>tick size</> (for example 1,000,000)
A large ratio between currency and
<DS:DE.TBA_CURRUNIT>currency unit</> (for example 1,000,000 instead of
0.01)
A combination of the above-mentioned reasons (for example tons for the
contract, kilograms for the quotation, and a tick amount of 1,000)
The tick value could not be calculated and an error message is issued.
Depending on the reason, proceed as follows:
Use reasonable units of measure for the contract and for the quotation.
Enter a smaller tick size.
Check whether the ratio between the currency unit and its currency has
been configured correctly.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
TBA1131
- Tick value is too large ?The SAP error message TBA1131, which states "Tick value is too large," typically occurs in the context of time-based calculations or scheduling within SAP systems, particularly in modules related to production planning or project management. This error indicates that the tick value (which represents a time unit or interval) exceeds the allowable limit set by the system.
Cause:
- Excessive Time Intervals: The tick value may be derived from a calculation that results in a time interval that is too large for the system to handle. This can happen if the duration of a task, project, or production order is set incorrectly.
- Configuration Issues: There may be configuration settings in the system that define maximum allowable values for time intervals, and these settings may need to be reviewed.
- Data Entry Errors: Incorrect data entry in the relevant fields (e.g., scheduling parameters, production times) can lead to unrealistic tick values.
Solution:
- Review Time Settings: Check the time settings in the relevant configuration areas (e.g., production scheduling, project management) to ensure that they are set correctly and within acceptable limits.
- Adjust Task Durations: If the error is related to a specific task or project, review the durations assigned to tasks and adjust them to more realistic values.
- Check for Data Entry Errors: Verify that all relevant data has been entered correctly and that there are no typos or incorrect values that could lead to excessive tick values.
- Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for specific guidelines on the maximum allowable tick values for your version of SAP.
- System Configuration: If necessary, consult with your SAP Basis or configuration team to adjust system settings that may be causing the issue.
Related Information:
If the problem persists after trying the above solutions, it may be beneficial to escalate the issue to your SAP support team or consult with SAP directly for further assistance.
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
TBA1130
There is a tick value for unlisted MIC &1
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
TBA1129
Assignment of MIC &1 was already released and cannot be deleted.
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
TBA1132
Entry for tick data required for all MICs
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
TBA1133
Tick value for 'Valid from' date &1 must be updated
What causes this issue? The tick value is not correct. This could be because the contract size of the corresponding underlying has been changed in th...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.