How To Fix SY349 - Overflow with arithmetic operation ( type I, &)

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SY - ABAP/4 system messages

• Message number: 349

• Message text: Overflow with arithmetic operation ( type I, &)

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message SY349 - Overflow with arithmetic operation ( type I, &) ?

  The SAP error message SY349, which indicates an "Overflow with arithmetic operation (type I, &)," typically occurs when an arithmetic operation results in a value that exceeds the maximum limit for the data type being used. In this case, "type I" refers to an integer data type in ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming), which has a maximum value of 2,147,483,647.
  Cause:
  The error can occur due to several reasons, including:
  
  Arithmetic Operations: Performing calculations that result in a value larger than the maximum limit for integers (e.g., adding two large integers).
  Data Type Mismatch: Using an integer type where a larger data type (like a floating-point number or a long integer) would be more appropriate.
  Looping Constructs: Accumulating values in a loop that leads to an overflow.
  Incorrect Initialization: Variables not being initialized properly before use in calculations.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve the SY349 error, consider the following solutions:
  
  
  Check Arithmetic Operations: Review the arithmetic operations in your code to ensure that they do not exceed the limits of the integer data type. If necessary, break down the calculations or use smaller increments.
  
  
  Use Larger Data Types: If you anticipate that the result of your calculations may exceed the limits of an integer, consider using a larger data type, such as:
  
  TYPE I (Integer) to TYPE P (Packed Number) or TYPE F (Floating Point).
  For example, if you are summing values, you can declare the variable as DATA(result) TYPE P DECIMALS 0.
  
  
  
  Implement Error Handling: Add checks before performing arithmetic operations to ensure that the values will not cause an overflow. For example, you can check if the sum of two integers exceeds the maximum limit before performing the addition.
  
  
  Debugging: Use debugging tools to trace the values of variables involved in the arithmetic operation. This can help identify where the overflow is occurring.
  
  
  Review Loops: If the error occurs within a loop, ensure that the loop's logic does not lead to excessive accumulation of values.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Data Types in ABAP: Understanding the different data types and their limits in ABAP is crucial. The integer type (I) has a range of -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647.
  Arithmetic Operations: Familiarize yourself with how arithmetic operations work in ABAP and the implications of using different data types.
  SAP Documentation: Refer to the official SAP documentation for more details on data types and error handling in ABAP.
  
  By following these guidelines, you should be able to identify the cause of the SY349 error and implement a suitable solution.