How To Fix SWDP_WB_TOOL193 - Naming conflict: Interface view & is contained in comp. interface & and &

SWDP_WB_TOOL193 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SWDP_WB_TOOL - Web Dynpro: Messages for Workbench Tools

• Message number: 193

• Message text: Naming conflict: Interface view & is contained in comp. interface & and &

What causes this issue?

Web Dynpro component &V4& implements Web Dynpro component interfaces
&V2& and &V3&. Both of these contain interface view &V1& with the same
name. This results in a naming conflict in Web Dynpro component &V4&.

System Response

Web Dynpro component &V4& cannot implement Web Dynpro component
interfaces &V2& and &V3& at the same time.

How to fix this error?

Remove either &V2& or &V3& from the interfaces that are implemented in
Web Dynpro component &V4&.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message SWDP_WB_TOOL193 - Naming conflict: Interface view & is contained in comp. interface & and & ?

  The SAP error message SWDP_WB_TOOL193 indicates a naming conflict in the context of interface views within the SAP Web Dynpro framework. This error typically arises when there are two or more interface views with the same name in the same component interface or when there is a conflict between the naming of interface views across different component interfaces.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Naming: The most common cause is that there are two interface views with the same name defined in the same component interface or across different component interfaces.
  Incorrect Configuration: Sometimes, the configuration of the component interfaces may not be set up correctly, leading to conflicts.
  Transport Issues: If changes were transported from one system to another, it might lead to conflicts if the same interface view names exist in both systems.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Rename Interface Views: The most straightforward solution is to rename one of the conflicting interface views to ensure that each view has a unique