Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: SV - View Maintenance: Customize Messages
Message number: 577
Message text: No field name specified for predecessor object &.
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
SV577
- No field name specified for predecessor object &. ?The SAP error message SV577 "No field name specified for predecessor object &." typically occurs in the context of data modeling or when working with certain SAP applications, particularly in the areas of data extraction or transformation. This error indicates that the system is expecting a field name for a predecessor object, but none has been specified.
Cause:
- Missing Field Specification: The most common cause of this error is that a required field name has not been specified for a predecessor object in a data model or transformation.
- Incorrect Configuration: There may be an issue with the configuration of the data model or the extraction process, where the predecessor object is not properly defined.
- Data Source Issues: If the predecessor object is linked to a data source that is not correctly set up or is missing fields, this error can occur.
- Version Compatibility: Sometimes, this error can arise due to compatibility issues between different versions of SAP or between different components of the SAP system.
Solution:
- Check Configuration: Review the configuration of the data model or transformation to ensure that all predecessor objects have the required field names specified. This may involve checking the settings in the Data Warehousing Workbench or similar tools.
- Define Field Names: If the predecessor object is missing field names, you will need to define them. This can usually be done in the relevant transaction or configuration screen where the predecessor object is defined.
- Validate Data Sources: Ensure that the data sources linked to the predecessor object are correctly configured and that all necessary fields are available.
- Review Documentation: Consult the SAP documentation or help resources for the specific module you are working with to understand the requirements for predecessor objects and field specifications.
- Check for Updates: If you suspect a version compatibility issue, check for any available updates or patches for your SAP system that may address this error.
Related Information:
If the issue persists after following these steps, it may be beneficial to reach out to SAP support for further assistance, providing them with detailed information about the context in which the error occurs.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
SV576
Max. number & objects exceeded in view cluster.
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
SV575
No entry for the predecessor & of object & in the object structure.
What causes this issue? The predecessor objekt &V1& of the object &V2& is not an object of the object structure.System Response The ...
SV578
Field & of object & is not read only.
What causes this issue? The field relationship 'S' was specified, but the object field &V1& is not flagged in the data dictionary a...
SV579
Key field & of object & is for navigation.
What causes this issue? The field relationship type is specied as 'S', but the object field &V1& is a key field which is used for n...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.