How To Fix SRFAC_IMPL054 - New &1 used for generic parameter, type compatibility is not guaranteed.

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SRFAC_IMPL - Refactoring messages

• Message number: 054

• Message text: New &1 used for generic parameter, type compatibility is not guaranteed.

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message SRFAC_IMPL054 - New &1 used for generic parameter, type compatibility is not guaranteed. ?

  The SAP error message SRFAC_IMPL054 indicates that there is a type compatibility issue with a generic parameter in your ABAP code. This typically occurs when you are using a generic type or a generic interface, and the system cannot guarantee that the type being used is compatible with the expected type.
  
  Cause:
  
  Generic Parameter Usage: The error arises when a generic parameter (like a type or interface) is used in a way that the system cannot ensure type safety. This often happens in method definitions or class definitions where generics are involved.
  Type Mismatch: The specific type being passed does not match the expected type, or the generic type is too broad, leading to ambiguity.
  Inconsistent Type Definitions: If the generic type is defined in a way that does not align with the actual types being used, this error can occur.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Type Definitions: Review the definitions of the generic types and ensure that the