How To Fix SLS_LO_GAF_EWB153 - Field identifier &1 is already used in appendage of field &2

SLS_LO_GAF_EWB153 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SLS_LO_GAF_EWB - GAF Enh WB Msg for LO based FPM config sales UI

• Message number: 153

• Message text: Field identifier &1 is already used in appendage of field &2

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

SLS_LO_GAF_EWB153 - Details

• The SAP error message SLS_LO_GAF_EWB153 indicates that there is a conflict with field identifiers in an append structure. Specifically, it means that the field identifier you are trying to use (denoted as &1) is already in use in the append structure of another field (denoted as &2). This typically occurs during the development or modification of data structures in ABAP, particularly when working with append structures in tables.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Field Identifier: The field identifier you are trying to add to an append structure is already defined in that append structure or in another append structure that is associated with the same table.
  Naming Conflicts: There may be naming conflicts due to the use of similar or identical field names in different append structures or tables.
  Inconsistent Data Dictionary: Changes made to the data dictionary (like adding fields) may not have been properly activated or may conflict with existing definitions.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Existing Fields: Review the